Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2325579
 


 



Private Enforcement


Stephen B. Burbank


University of Pennsylvania Law School

Sean Farhang


University of California, Berkeley

Herbert M. Kritzer


University of Minnesota Law School

Fall 2013

Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 17, P. 637, 2013
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 13-22
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-46

Abstract:     
Our aim in this Article is to advance understanding of private enforcement of statutory and administrative law in the United States and to raise questions that will be useful to those who are concerned with regulatory design in other countries. To that end, we briefly discuss aspects of American culture, history, and political institutions that reasonably can be thought to have contributed to the growth and subsequent development of private enforcement. We also set forth key elements of the general legal landscape in which decisions about private enforcement are made, aspects of which should be central to the choice of an enforcement strategy and, in the case of private enforcement, are critical to the efficacy of a private enforcement regime. We then turn to the business of institutional architecture, describing the considerations — both in favor of and against private enforcement — that should affect the choice of an enforcement strategy. We lay out choices to be made about elements of a private enforcement regime, attending to the general legal landscape in which the regime would operate, particularly court access, as well as how incentives for enforcement interact with the market for legal services, which has important implications for private enforcement activity. We situate these legislative choices about private enforcement in the context of institutions that shape them. Finally, we seek to demonstrate how general considerations play out by examining private enforcement in two policy areas: legislation proscribing discrimination in employment, and laws protecting consumers from unfair and deceptive practices.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 88

Keywords: Administrative law, politics, practice and procedure, regulation, delegation, compliance, structure of private enforcement, common law, enforcement regimes, employment discrimination law, consumer protection legislation

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 15, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Burbank, Stephen B. and Farhang, Sean and Kritzer, Herbert M., Private Enforcement (Fall 2013). Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 17, P. 637, 2013; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 13-22; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-46. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2325579

Contact Information

Stephen B. Burbank (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Sean Farhang
University of California, Berkeley ( email )
310 Barrows Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States
Herbert M. Kritzer
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 234
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 150,459

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds