Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2326746
 


 



Fool's Gold: an Illustrated Critique of Differential Privacy


Jane R. Bambauer


University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law

Krish Muralidhar


Price College of Business, University of Oklahoma

Rathindra Sarathy


Oklahoma State University - Stillwater

September 15, 2013

16 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2014 (Forthcoming)
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 13-47

Abstract:     
Differential privacy has taken the privacy community by storm. Computer scientists developed this technique to allow researchers to submit queries to databases without being able to glean sensitive information about the individuals described in the data. Legal scholars champion differential privacy as a practical solution to the competing interests in research and confidentiality, and policymakers are poised to adopt it as the gold standard for data privacy. It would be a disastrous mistake.

This Article provides an illustrated guide to the virtues and pitfalls of differential privacy. While the technique is suitable for a narrow set of research uses, the great majority of analyses would produce results that are beyond absurd: average income in the negative millions, or correlations well above 1, for example.

The legal community has been misled into thinking that differential privacy can offer the benefits of data research without sacrificing privacy. In fact, differential privacy will usually produce either very wrong research results or very useless privacy protections. Policymakers and data stewards will have to rely on a mix of approaches: perhaps differential privacy where it is well-suited to the task, and other disclosure prevention techniques in the great majority of situations where it isn’t.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: differential privacy, privacy, confidentiality, data privacy, data research, disclosure

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 17, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Bambauer, Jane R. and Muralidhar, Krish and Sarathy, Rathindra, Fool's Gold: an Illustrated Critique of Differential Privacy (September 15, 2013). 16 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2014 (Forthcoming); Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 13-47. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2326746

Contact Information

Jane R. Yakowitz Bambauer (Contact Author)
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
Krish Muralidhar
Price College of Business, University of Oklahoma ( email )
Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Managemen
Norman, OK 73019
United States
HOME PAGE: http://gatton.uky.edu/faculty/muralidhar/
Rathindra Sarathy
Oklahoma State University - Stillwater ( email )
Stillwater, OK 74078-0555
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,294
Downloads: 225
Download Rank: 77,555

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds