Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2327133
 


 



One Path for 'Post-Racial' Employment Discrimination Cases -- The Implicit Association Test Research as Social Framework Evidence


Tanya Kateri Hernandez


Fordham University School of Law

April 23, 2014

32 Journal of Law & Inequality 307 (2014)
Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2327133

Abstract:     
Today’s legal civil rights struggle is in large measure the effort to retain the foundational premise that racial discrimination is still a pervasive and problematic dynamic that law should be engaged in addressing. Within the employment discrimination context the attempt to salvage anti-discrimination law doctrine has been lodged on several fronts. Of particular note has been the effort to incorporate “social framework” evidence. Yet, given the powerful societal conviction in a “post-racial” American narrative of discrimination as an exceptionally rare event caused by aberrant malicious individuals, general social framework evidence alone will be unlikely to assist most plaintiffs present a persuasive case of discrimination. What is needed is a legal tool that can directly speak to the larger societal narrative in ways that assist fact-finders better understand contemporary manifestations of discrimination. This Article proposes that the use of general social framework evidence specifically incorporate the burgeoning social psychology literature regarding “implicit bias.”

When the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was enacted there was no particular need for litigants to import social framework evidence let alone implicit bias data. Newspapers and the televised evening news were replete with concrete images of the reality of the violence of racial segregation and the relevance of race in how society was structured. The social context of the time provided every discrimination case an immediate social framework for processing claims and understanding that circumstantial evidence of discrimination was sufficient in the absence of a defendant’s legal justification for differential treatment, status or access. The social context of the reality of racism was the metaphorical glue that connected differential status and the absence of a nondiscriminatory employer justification into a structure identified as “discrimination.” But with the dismantlement of visible Jim Crow segregation and the cessation in television film coverage of massive physical brutality against scores of African Americans, the reality of racism became more attenuated for those not directly affected by it. What is needed is a new form of metaphorical glue. This Article concludes that social framework evidence as informed by the social psychology data about implicit bias and the Implicit Association Test may be the new metaphorical glue that is needed for properly assessing claims of discrimination.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: implicit bias, social framework evidence, employment discrimination

JEL Classification: J70, J71, K31, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 18, 2013 ; Last revised: April 24, 2014

Suggested Citation

Hernandez, Tanya Kateri, One Path for 'Post-Racial' Employment Discrimination Cases -- The Implicit Association Test Research as Social Framework Evidence (April 23, 2014). 32 Journal of Law & Inequality 307 (2014); Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2327133. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2327133

Contact Information

Tanya Kateri Hernandez (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
HOME PAGE: http://sites.google.com/site/professortkh/home
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 365
Downloads: 37

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds