Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2327739
 


 



In Denial: The Role of Law in Preparing for Death


Barbara A. Noah


Western New England University School of Law

2013

Elder Law Journal, Vol. 21, p. 1, 2013
Western New England University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-14

Abstract:     
Only approximately 20% of Americans have engaged in any form of advance care planning and, even among older Americans, the process frequently is delayed until an acute illness provides sufficient pressure to act. End of life law, though flawed, offers some opportunity to express individual values and preferences via advance directives of various kinds in order to prepare for death before it is imminent. Yet many people avoid making these preparations because the thought of death is uncomfortable to confront. This Article considers the utility of existing law in preventing and resolving end of life disputes and avoiding over-utilization of life-prolonging technology and the law's inevitable failure to address complex issues concerning quality of life and communication about this inevitable but usually unpredictable event.

The so-called technological imperative and the cultural admiration of those who "fight" and "do everything" to defeat illness have created an atmosphere in which physicians and patients often feel complementarily reluctant to engage in thoughtful discussions about the patient's values, preferences, and concerns or, worse, even to acknowledge openly the fact of the patient's dying. In addition, the presumption in favor of continued treatment for patients who have lost decisional capacity has created a situation in which patients are frequently subjected to multiple therapeutic and lifesupportive technologies that they would not wish for if they could make the choice. This lacuna of unconsidered choices suggests a significant need for formal expressions of end of life preferences, or at least serious conversation with family and health care providers about one's preferences. The law allows individuals to express their preferences on these matters, but creates little incentive to do so.

As other commentators have noted, advance directives rarely resolve end of life disputes -- these commentators have therefore suggested abandoning efforts to encourage the utilization of advance directives. There is, however, a compelling argument in favor of continuing and expanding the practice -- namely, the inherent and immediate benefit to the individual of carefully and systematically thinking about and executing an advance directive or, at least, discussing preferences with a health care proxy. Laws encouraging advance directives provide a structural context in which individuals can acknowledge their mortality and make the effort to consider and articulate to themselves and others their values and preferences, resulting in much potential benefit to themselves, their families and their health care providers, not only at the end of life but throughout life. Regularizing this practice throughout adulthood may gradually reduce the impact of the technology juggernaut on the dying process. This Article concludes by examining the ways in which end of life law and the medical education system might be reformed to promote individual reflection and conversations between patients and physicians in order to prepare for death.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: advance care planning, end of life law, advance directives, living wills, end of life preferences, end of life care, Schiavo case, denial of death

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 21, 2013 ; Last revised: October 16, 2013

Suggested Citation

Noah, Barbara A., In Denial: The Role of Law in Preparing for Death (2013). Elder Law Journal, Vol. 21, p. 1, 2013; Western New England University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2327739

Contact Information

Barbara A. Noah (Contact Author)
Western New England University School of Law ( email )
1215 Wilbraham Road
Springfield, MA 01119
United States
413-782-1432 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 305
Downloads: 78
Download Rank: 187,710

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.313 seconds