Why Patent Law Doesn't Do Innovation Policy
London School of Economics and Political Science
November 13, 2013
LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 20/2013
Calls for patent law to take on a more explicit innovation policy agenda have recently increased in urgency. There is however a considerable difference between incentive to invent and incentive to innovate in terms of outcome. Institutional dynamics in patent systems based on the incentive to invent premise constrict rationality and decision-making capability to the extent that an injection of externally devised ‘innovation policy’ seems impossible unless also accompanied by far reaching institutional changes. In both US and Europe technology-specific legal standards in patent law and market specific economic analysis in competition law are a natural point of congruence when considering existing institutional dynamics that support innovation.
This short essay looks primarily at European law to analyse the different ways in which patent law is inured to resist the imposition of economic analysis common to competition policy. There are however spaces within current legal rules that lend themselves well to an examination of the sector specific commercial contexts of inventions. These can and ought to be used robustly to better reflect elements of market specific innovation policies.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14
Keywords: Innovation, Patent law, Competition, Antitrust, Institutionalism, Incentive to inventworking papers series
Date posted: September 20, 2013 ; Last revised: November 14, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.687 seconds