Georgetown University Law Center
G. Mitu Gulati
Duke University School of Law
Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 41, pp. 367-385, 2013
The Greek debt crisis prompted EU officials to embark on a radical reconstruction of the European sovereign debt markets. Prominently featured in this reconstruction was a set of contract provisions called Collective Action Clauses, or CACs. CACs are supposed to help governments and private creditors to renegotiate unsustainable debt contracts, and obviate the need for EU bailouts. But European sovereign debt contacts were already amenable to restructuring; adding CACs could make it harder. Why, then, promote CACs at all, and cast them in such a central role in the market reform initiative? Using interviews with participants in the initiative and those affected by it, as well as observations at policy and academic meetings, we attempt to shed light on the puzzle and draw implications for the role of contract techniques in market construction.
Keywords: legal theory of finance, Eurozone, sovereign debt, collective action clauses
JEL Classification: F34, F55, F65, G15, G20, G28, H63, H81, K2, N20, P16, P43, P48
Date posted: September 30, 2013 ; Last revised: December 25, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.531 seconds