Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2332348
 


 



Altering Attention in Adjudication


Jeffrey J. Rachlinski


Cornell Law School

Andrew J. Wistrich


California Central District Court

Chris Guthrie


Vanderbilt University - Law School

September 27, 2013

UCLA Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 1586, 2013
Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 13-32
Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 13-45

Abstract:     
Judges decide complex cases in rapid succession but are limited by cognitive constraints. Consequently judges cannot allocate equal attention to every aspect of a case. Case outcomes might thus depend on which aspects of a case are particularly salient to the judge. Put simply, a judge focusing on one aspect of a case might reach a different outcome than a judge focusing on another. In this Article, we report the results of a series of studies exploring various ways in which directing judicial attention can shape judicial outcomes. In the first study, we show that judges impose shorter sentences when information concerning the cost of incarceration is made available to them. In the second study, we demonstrate that judges assess the credibility of an expert witnesses more favorably when lawyers present an additional expert with similar, albeit notably weaker, credentials. In the third, we show that the format in which prosecutors present forensic testimony can alter judges’ assessments of that testimony’s probative value. Finally, we demonstrate that judges’ willingness to ignore inadmissible evidence in a criminal case is affected by both the gravity of the crime and the severity of police misconduct. In each of these studies, varying the context in which judges review evidence or altering the form in which that evidence is presented shifts judges’ attention and alters their decisions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 29, 2013 ; Last revised: October 29, 2013

Suggested Citation

Rachlinski , Jeffrey J. and Wistrich, Andrew J. and Guthrie, Chris, Altering Attention in Adjudication (September 27, 2013). UCLA Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 1586, 2013; Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 13-32; Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 13-45. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2332348

Contact Information

Jeffrey John Rachlinski (Contact Author)
Cornell Law School ( email )
524 College Ave
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-5878 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)
Andrew J. Wistrich
California Central District Court ( email )
Los Angeles, CA 90012
United States
Chris Guthrie
Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )
131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States
615-322-6823 (Phone)
615-322-6631 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 251
Downloads: 80
Download Rank: 179,822
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.390 seconds