Sex Without Consent
Northwestern University - School of Law; DePaul University - College of Law
September 27, 2013
Yale Law Journal Online, Vol. 23, No. 335, 2013
DePaul Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-02
Modern rape law lacks a governing principle. In "The Riddle of Rape-by-Deception and the Myth of Sexual Autonomy," Jed Rubenfeld contends that the most obvious candidate — sexual autonomy — is inadequate. I agree, though for vastly different reasons. Rubenfeld advances a conception of rape as a violation of a right to self-possession; this approach raises real problems. I introduce an alternative understanding of rape — rape as a violation of sexual agency. Theories of agency expressly contemplate its exercise under constraints. This framework thus can account for both women’s sexual violation and the value of women’s sexual subjectivity. The turn to agency provides new justification for defining rape as sex without consent.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19
Keywords: rape, consent, sexual agencyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 30, 2013 ; Last revised: March 1, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.438 seconds