Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2333625
 


 



Screening Out Innovation: The Merits of Meritless Litigation


Alex Reinert


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

September 30, 2013

Indiana Law Journal, Forthcoming
Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 405

Abstract:     
Courts and legislatures often conflate merit-less and frivolous cases when balancing the desire to keep courthouse doors open to novel or unlikely claims against the concern that entertaining ultimately unsuccessful litigation will prove too costly for courts and defendants. Recently, significant procedural and substantive barriers to civil litigation have been informed by judicial and legislative assumptions about the costs of entertaining merit-less and frivolous litigation. The prevailing wisdom is that eliminating merit-less and frivolous claims as early in a case’s trajectory as possible will focus scarce resources on the truly meritorious cases, thereby ensuring that available remedies are properly distributed to deserving plaintiffs.

Frivolous and merit-less litigation are not the same, however. Frivolous claims are easier to identify at the outset of litigation because they rest on unrecognizable legal theories or fantastical factual allegations. More importantly, merit-less litigation has a distinct and identifiable value that is obscured by conflating merit-less claims with frivolous ones. Unlike frivolous litigation, merit-less litigation can bring to light facts that may lead to systematic reform (even where no legal cause of action lies), lead to legal innovation by announcing new interpretations of common law and statutory and constitutional texts, and pave the way for future changes in the law. Recognizing the value of merit-less litigation and distinguishing merit-less from frivolous cases therefore raises questions about the recent barriers that have been imposed to civil litigation. Taking the value of merit-less litigation into account is essential if we are to strike the correct balance between the costs and benefits of keeping courthouse doors open.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: frivolous litigation, civil procedure, pleading, meritless litigation

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 30, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Reinert, Alex, Screening Out Innovation: The Merits of Meritless Litigation (September 30, 2013). Indiana Law Journal, Forthcoming; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 405. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2333625

Contact Information

Alexander A. Reinert (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 301
Downloads: 90
Download Rank: 166,725

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.250 seconds