Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2334977
 


 



Why Arizona v. Gant Is the Wrong Solution to the Warrantless Cell Phone Search Problem


Adam M. Gershowitz


William & Mary Law School

October 2, 2013

Boston University Law Review Annex, 2014, Forthcoming
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-262

Abstract:     
This brief essay rejects the argument made by some scholars that Arizona v. Gant’s "reasonable to believe" framework should be applied to searches of cell phones incident to arrest. The Gant decision scaled back the searches of automobiles incident to arrest by requiring that police reasonably believe evidence of the crime of arrest might be found in the vehicle. The Gant doctrine is a poor choice for cell phone searches because it is reasonable for police to believe evidence of numerous minor offenses – drunk driving, theft, possession of small amounts of marijuana, public intoxication, graffiti, prostitution, and disorderly conduct – might be found on a cell phone. As technology improves, the number of minor offenses that could give rise to a warrantless cell phone search under Gant would likely increase. And at the same time that the Gant doctrine would provide police with broad authority, it would fail to set clear lines for which cell phone searches are permissible and which are not.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: search incident to arrest, cell phone, warrantless, Gant, Fourth Amendment

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 4, 2013 ; Last revised: November 20, 2013

Suggested Citation

Gershowitz, Adam M., Why Arizona v. Gant Is the Wrong Solution to the Warrantless Cell Phone Search Problem (October 2, 2013). Boston University Law Review Annex, 2014, Forthcoming; William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-262. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2334977

Contact Information

Adam M. Gershowitz (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 290
Downloads: 54
Download Rank: 227,460

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.313 seconds