Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2335613
 


 



Too Much Frivolity, Not Enough Femininity: A Study of Gender and Humor at the U.S. Supreme Court


Ryan A. Malphurs


Courtroom Sciences, Inc.

Jaime Bochantin


DePaul University

L. Hailey Drescher


University of Kansas; University of Kansas

Melissa Wallace Framer


Arizona State University, Hugh Downs School of Human Communication

October 3, 2013


Abstract:     
The four authors in this study took on the exhilarating task of listening to 79 oral arguments in the Supreme Court’s 2011-2012 term. After two years spent recovering from oral argument overload, the authors have prepared a study that ingeniously tricks readers into reading a study on humor that is really about gender inequality at the Supreme Court and in the field of Law. Initially tallying instances of un-transcribed laughter, the authors — prompted by Hillary Clinton’s urging — began noticing gender and humor discrepancies between the justices and the advocates; what started as a simple humor tabulation devolved into important research. In the following study, the authors lull readers into complacency by offering data related to humor, but then shock their audience with serious data about gender inequality — ruining any fun that readers might have had. It’s true the authors show that the Supreme Court is far funnier than previously thought, and that Justice Scalia enjoys bullying Justice Breyer; however, potential readers should turn back now, because what follows is mind numbing boredom and “PC” discussions about gender veiled within a “humor” study.

The authors would like readers to know that the following study, if you haven’t been able to tell already, does not follow traditional scholarly conventions. “Why?” you may ask, because it would be boring and no one would read it, duh. The authors have endeavored to make this study both interesting in the data and entertaining to read — a truly ground-breaking feat in scholarly studies. Great risk comes with great rewards, and we’re just hoping someone other than ourselves will read this study.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: Supreme Court, Humor, Gender, Law, Rhetoric, Discourse

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 5, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Malphurs, Ryan A. and Bochantin, Jaime and Drescher, L. Hailey and Framer, Melissa Wallace, Too Much Frivolity, Not Enough Femininity: A Study of Gender and Humor at the U.S. Supreme Court (October 3, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2335613 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2335613

Contact Information

Ryan A. Malphurs (Contact Author)
Courtroom Sciences, Inc. ( email )
4950 N. O'Connor Rd.
Irving, TX TX 75062
972-717-1773 (Phone)
Jaime Bochantin
DePaul University ( email )
1 East Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604
United States
L. Hailey Drescher
University of Kansas ( email )
1415
Lawrence, KS 66045
United States
University of Kansas ( email )
1450 Jayhawk Blvd.
Lawrence, KS 66045
United States
Melissa Wallace Framer
Arizona State University, Hugh Downs School of Human Communication ( email )
Farmer Building 440G PO Box 872011
Tempe, AZ 85287
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,022
Downloads: 619
Download Rank: 23,110

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.453 seconds