Developing a Framework for Arbitrating Standards-Essential Patent Disputes

Jorge L. Contreras

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

David L. Newman

Arnstein & Lehr, LLP

April 21, 2014

Journal of Dispute Resolution, Forthcoming
American University, WCL Research Paper 2014-20

A growing chorus of voices is calling for the use of arbitration to resolve disputes concerning standards-essential patents (SEPs). Those advocating the arbitration of SEP-related disputes include academic commentators, government officials and members of the professional bar. Most cite the potential savings of cost and time that arbitration could achieve over the multi-year, resource-intensive lawsuits that currently characterize these disputes. But despite these ringing endorsements, there is surprisingly little guidance available for parties, standards-development organizations (SDOs), and tribunals that wish to implement effective arbitration procedures for these complex disputes.

In this article, we lay the groundwork for the development of such procedures and identify several key areas in which further study and deliberation will be required. We pay particular attention to fundamental questions such as whether SEP arbitration should be mandated by SDOs, which issues should be arbitrated, whether arbitral decisions should be confidential, and what form arbitration proceedings should take. While, at this early stage, we do not purport to answer these difficult questions in a definitive manner, we offer a framework for further discussion that we hope will be useful for policy makers, industry participants and commentators considering these important issues.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: standards, patent, interoperability, arbitration, ADR, mediation, FTC, Google, FRAND, RAND

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: October 5, 2013 ; Last revised: June 13, 2014

Suggested Citation

Contreras, Jorge L. and Newman, David L., Developing a Framework for Arbitrating Standards-Essential Patent Disputes (April 21, 2014). Journal of Dispute Resolution, Forthcoming; American University, WCL Research Paper 2014-20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2335732

Contact Information

Jorge L. Contreras (Contact Author)
University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
332 S. 1400 East Front
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

David L. Newman
Arnstein & Lehr, LLP ( email )
120 South Riverside Plaza
Suite 1200
Chicago, IL 60606
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 811
Downloads: 219
Download Rank: 80,521
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.422 seconds