Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2336677
 


 



Neutrality Agreements and Article III Standing: Why Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall is Nonjusticiable


T. Ward Frampton


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

October 7, 2013


Abstract:     
Next month, the Supreme Court will consider whether union-employer "neutrality agreements" run afoul of Section 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act. One facet of this dispute, however, has been overlooked: Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall is not a "case or controversy" at all. Martin Mulhall, the Florida casino worker hoping to block the enforcement of a neutrality agreement between his employer and Local 355, lacks standing.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 9, 2013 ; Last revised: April 12, 2014

Suggested Citation

Frampton, T. Ward, Neutrality Agreements and Article III Standing: Why Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall is Nonjusticiable (October 7, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2336677 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2336677

Contact Information

T. Ward Frampton (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 786
Downloads: 104
Download Rank: 155,686

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds