Neutrality Agreements and Article III Standing: Why Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall is Nonjusticiable
T. Ward Frampton
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
October 7, 2013
Next month, the Supreme Court will consider whether union-employer "neutrality agreements" run afoul of Section 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act. One facet of this dispute, however, has been overlooked: Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall is not a "case or controversy" at all. Martin Mulhall, the Florida casino worker hoping to block the enforcement of a neutrality agreement between his employer and Local 355, lacks standing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12working papers series
Date posted: October 9, 2013 ; Last revised: April 12, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.438 seconds