Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2336757
 


 



Qualified Newsperson's Privilege Does Not Extend to Authors


Patrick Corbett


affiliation not provided to SSRN

1986

Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 61, 1986

Abstract:     
This comment discusses a grand jury's power to subpoena an author's personal notes and records. In the case of In re Grand Jury Matter, Gronowicz, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that a grand jury could subpoena an author's personal notes and records while investigating him for mail and wire fraud. The court reasoned that because the investigation was proper and the material sought was relevant to the investigation, the grand jury could issue the subpoena consistent with the first amendment. The court did not consider a qualified privilege to balance the author's first amendment rights with society's interest in prosecuting crime. Other courts, however, have applied such a privilege in different contexts. Ignoring this privilege could arguably chill the free flow of information from writers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: qualified newsperson's privilege, grand jury subpoena, author, first amendment, writers

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 12, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Corbett, Patrick, Qualified Newsperson's Privilege Does Not Extend to Authors (1986). Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 61, 1986. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2336757

Contact Information

Patrick Corbett (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 53
Downloads: 2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.265 seconds