The Historical Contingencies of Conflict Resolution
Georgetown University Law Center; University of California Irvine, School of Law
International Journal of Conflict Engagement & Resolution, Vol. 1, pp. 32-55, 2013
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper, No. 2013-155
This article reviews the historical contingency of theory and practice in conflict engagement. World War II and the Cold War produced adversarial, distributive, competitive, and scarce resources conceptions of negotiation and conflict resolution, as evidenced by game theory and negotiation practice. More recent and more optimistic theory and practice has focused on party needs and interests and hopes for more party-tailored, contingent, flexible, participatory and more integrative and creative solutions for more than two disputants to a conflict. The current challenges of our present history are explored: continued conflict in both domestic and international settings, the challenge of “scaling up” conflict resolution theory and the problematics of developing universal theory in highly contextualized and diverse sets of conflict sites. The limits of “rationality” in conflict resolution is explored where feelings and ethical, religious and other values may be just as important in conflict engagement and handling.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: history of ADR, consensus building, multi-party dispute resolution, theory development, conflict handling
JEL Classification: K30, K33, K39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 8, 2013 ; Last revised: November 14, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds