Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2337825
 


 



Intellectual Property versus Prizes: Reframing the Debate


Benjamin N. Roin


Harvard Law School

October 8, 2013

University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 81, 2014

Abstract:     
The academic literature on the prize system describes prizes as a radical alternative to intellectual property. The debate over which system is preferable has existed for centuries, and usually boils down to a single question: can the government determine the appropriate reward for innovations without relying on intellectual property rights to reveal their value to consumers? If yes, scholars assume prizes are superior because they avoid deadweight loss and provide equal or better incentives for innovation. This reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of intellectual property rights. It equates intellectual property with uniform monopoly pricing and monopoly profits, while depicting the prize system as the only effective strategy to achieve efficient consumer pricing and government control over rewards. In reality, intellectual property merely provides a right to exclude others from the market. Governments can and often do institute policies alongside intellectual property that closely resemble prize systems in their structure and objectives. They use subsidies (and sometimes price controls) to push consumer prices closer to marginal cost and adjust the incentives for innovation. Given these other policy levers available within an intellectual property regime, the existing prize literature has exaggerated and misconceived the differences between the two systems. Under many circumstances, the prize system has no advantage over intellectual property in avoiding deadweight loss. Moreover, intellectual property will frequently offer superior incentives to prizes, irrespective of whether used to measure an invention’s value to consumers, because it provides an ongoing check against expropriation, thereby permitting renegotiation of rewards over time to reflect changing estimations of an invention’s social value. Contrary to the longstanding framework used to compare the two systems, intellectual property may be superior to prizes even when the government can determine the appropriate reward for innovations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: Patent, Patents, Intellectual Property, Prizes, Rewards

JEL Classification: H41, H50, K39, O31, O34, O38, P16

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 10, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Roin, Benjamin N., Intellectual Property versus Prizes: Reframing the Debate (October 8, 2013). University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 81, 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2337825

Contact Information

Benjamin N. Roin (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 574
Downloads: 136
Download Rank: 124,299
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds