Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2337947
 


 



May Regulations that Violate the APA Be Remanded to the IRS?


Patrick J. Smith


Ivins, Phillips & Barker

October 7, 2013

Tax Notes, Vol. 84, p. 141, 2013

Abstract:     
Last year in Dominion Resources, the Federal Circuit invalidated a tax regulation in part on the basis that it violated the Administrative Procedure Act’s arbitrary and capricious standard because the IRS failed to provide an explanation for the regulation at the time it was issued. It was the first time a court of appeals invalidated a tax regulation on that basis. This article discusses a recent case comment in the Harvard Law Review contending that although many tax regulations would be vulnerable to similar challenges, large-scale invalidation would be prevented by the practice followed by some courts of remanding defective regulations to the issuing agency for corrective action while leaving them in effect. This article disputes that contention, arguing that the practice of remanding without vacating would not apply to most tax litigation because of the Anti-Injunction Act.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: administrative law, validity of regulations, tax, State Farm, Anti-Injunction Act, arbitrary and capricious

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 10, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Smith, Patrick J., May Regulations that Violate the APA Be Remanded to the IRS? (October 7, 2013). Tax Notes, Vol. 84, p. 141, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2337947

Contact Information

Patrick J. Smith (Contact Author)
Ivins, Phillips & Barker ( email )
1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20006
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 104
Downloads: 45

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 1.125 seconds