Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2340387
 


 



Contract and Property Law: Distinct, but not Separate


Sjef Van Erp


Maastricht European Private Law Institute; University of Maastricht - Faculty of Law

October 15, 2013

MEPLI Working Paper Series 2013-14

Abstract:     
Contract and property law are traditionally seen as rather distinct parts of a legal system. However, there is growing awareness that contract and property are not so separate at all. We can observe more and more fuzzy boundaries. Four examples (case studies) are discussed: reclaiming money, the non-accessory mortgage, protection of mortgagors, private re-registration of mortgages in the US: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS). The fuzzy boundaries make us realise that the distinction between contract and property (in the classical, 19th century, model of private law: the absence or presence of the binding force of an arrangement on third parties) is becoming less of a binary and more of a gradual nature.

It seems that a growing category of intermediary rights is developing, rights between contract and property law, which may very well prove to have become no longer a dogmatic anomaly, but a necessary supplement to the traditional distinction between contract and property law. If this analysis is correct, it might imply that we have to rethink our categorisation of private law into a law of contract and a law of property, as we had to rethink the categorisation of private law into a law of contract and a law of tort after Gilmore’s famous statement that contract law was dead, or at least drowning in a sea of tort. It is not argued that contract law, again, is dead, but that contract law may have begun a new life as part of a broader category of arrangements regarding objects with burdening effect vis-à-vis third parties, where classical contract is one end of the spectrum (no third party effect) and property is the other end of the spectrum (full third party effect).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: Comparative contract, Comparative property, European property, MERS, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Non-accessory mortgage

JEL Classification: K11, K12, G21

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 15, 2013  

Suggested Citation

van Erp, Sjef, Contract and Property Law: Distinct, but not Separate (October 15, 2013). MEPLI Working Paper Series 2013-14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2340387 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2340387

Contact Information

Sjef J. H. M. Van Erp (Contact Author)
Maastricht European Private Law Institute ( email )
P.O. Box 616
Maastricht, NL-6200 MD
Netherlands
+31433883341 (Phone)
+31433884868 (Fax)
University of Maastricht - Faculty of Law ( email )
PO Box 616
Maastricht, 6200 MD
Netherlands
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 781
Downloads: 182
Download Rank: 96,612
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.765 seconds