Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2340682
 


 



Why Capital Punishment Violates the Constitutional Law of the United States


Michael J. Perry


Emory University School of Law

October 17, 2013

Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-259

Abstract:     
I explain in this paper why we are warranted in concluding that capital punishment — punishing a criminal by killing him — is both "cruel" and "unusual" within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment’s ban on "cruel and unusual punishments" and therefore violates the constitutional law of the United States. In setting the stage for that explanation, I discuss the internationally recognized human right not to be subjected to any punishment (or other treatment) that is "cruel, inhuman or degrading.". When I turn to the question of the original understanding of the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment, I discuss the important work of John Stinneford, explaining why I concur in Stinneford’s conclusion about the original understanding of "cruel" but dissent from his conclusion about the original understanding of "unusual."

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 18, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Perry, Michael J., Why Capital Punishment Violates the Constitutional Law of the United States (October 17, 2013). Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-259. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2340682

Contact Information

Michael John Perry (Contact Author)
Emory University School of Law ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-712-2086 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 694
Downloads: 192
Download Rank: 92,107

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds