Policing the Immigration Police: ICE Prosecutorial Discretion and the Fourth Amendment
Jason A. Cade
University of Georgia Law School
November 10, 2013
113 Columbia Law Review Sidebar 180 (2013)
UGA Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-04
A persistent puzzle in immigration law is how the removal adjudication system should respond to the increasing prevalence of violations of noncitizens’ constitutional rights by arresting officers. Scholarship in this area has focused on judicial suppression of unconstitutionally obtained evidence, typically by arguing that the Supreme Court should overrule its 1984 decision in INS v. Lopez-Mendoza not to enforce the exclusionary rule in civil immigration court. This Essay, in contrast, considers the role of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) attorneys in upholding the Fourth Amendment, taking as a launching point the recent exercise of prosecutorial discretion by ICE attorneys in Charlotte, North Carolina in cases arising from systemic unlawful policing.
Part I briefly describes how ICE's lawyers in the Charlotte immigration court have closed deportation cases against noncitizens arrested through unlawful policing by local officers in North Carolina, following a Department of Justice report on the discriminatory targeting of Latinos in Alamance County, North Carolina. The Essay then explores two potential bases for an ICE prosecutor’s decision to take remedial action when arresting officers violate the constitution. First, Part II examines ICE prosecutors’ constitutional responsibilities as executive branch attorneys in light of the Supreme Court’s decision to underenforce the Fourth Amendment in the context of immigration arrests. Part III then considers whether ICE’s remedial actions in North Carolina comport with internal agency guidelines for exercising prosecutorial discretion in deportation cases.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: Lopez-Mendoza, Brignoni-Ponce, suppression, exclusionary rule, administrative closure, John Morton, deportability, removability, inadmissibility, SComm, Secure Communities, 287(g), Criminal Alien Program, CAP, traffic stops, SB 1070, discriminatory policing, racial profiling, search and seizure
JEL Classification: D73, K14, J61
Date posted: October 26, 2013 ; Last revised: February 20, 2014
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.407 seconds