Managing the Repertoire: Stories, Metaphors, Prototypes, and Concept Coherence in Product Innovation
Victor P. Seidel
Babson College; Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences; University of Oxford
Siobhan Clare O'Mahony
Boston University School of Management
January 17, 2014
Organization Science, 2014
Boston U. School of Management Research Paper No. 2013-10
A recognized challenge in innovation scholarship is how to coordinate the efforts of many minds contributing to the design of a single artifact. Much research shows that product concept representations can help coordinate design tasks, but we know little about the practices that make representations more or less effective. We used an inductive approach to examine how six teams in three industries used concept representations when creating novel products. All six teams crafted three types of representations: stories, metaphors, and prototypes. However, merely using representations did not ensure a shared repertoire and concept coherence — a common understanding of desired product attributes. Teams that failed to consistently engage in three practices — 1) collective scrutiny of representations; 2) linking representations to design constraints; and 3) active editing of representations — produced concept disunity, with disparate understandings of desired product attributes. Teams that maintained concept coherence were better able to coordinate design tasks than teams that experienced concept disunity. Our research explains how the ultimate effect of concept representations on the coordination of innovation is contingent upon the practices used to manage a repertoire of representations in use.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49
Keywords: Product innovation, representations, boundary objects, coordination
JEL Classification: O32
Date posted: October 24, 2013 ; Last revised: April 17, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds