Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2348482
 


 



Moral Intuitions About Fault, Parenting, and Child Custody after Divorce


Ashley Votruba


Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Sanford L. Braver


Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology

Ira Mark Ellman


Arizona State University College of Law; Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology

William V. Fabricius


Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology

October 31, 2013


Abstract:     
Allocations of child custody post-divorce are currently determined according to the Best Interest Standard, i.e. on what is best for the child, as compared to standards of the recent past which weighed fairness to the parents or parental fault (or marital misconduct). Since any such evolving standards rest so fully on changing cultural norms, an important question is how these standards correspond to the moral intuitions of lay citizens asked to take the role of judge in hypothetical cases. Do factors such as whether one parent had an extramarital affair influence their custody decision-making? In the current studies, a representative sample of citizens awaiting jury service were first given a neutral scenario portraying an “average” family. Almost 80% favored dividing custodial time equally between the two parents, replicating our earlier finding. Then, in Study 1, they were given a second, Test case, vignette in which either the mother or the father was said to have carried on an extramarital affair that “essentially ruined the marriage”. In Study 2, either the mother or the father was said to have sought the divorce, opposed by the other, simply because he or she “grew tired” of the marriage. For both Test cases, more than half the respondents made little or no adjustment to their parenting time allocation, but a substantial minority did, awarding the offending parent significantly less parenting time. While one might guess some respondents would be motivated to punish the adulterous parent, we believe it less likely they would believe it appropriate to punish a spouse who sought to end marriages they no longer found satisfying. Given that there was relatively little difference in our respondents' reactions to the two test cases, we therefore considered explanations, for the responses of those who did reduce parenting time, that could apply equally to both test cases. We suggest two possibilities: 1) they find the behavior in both test cases evidence that the offending parents' commitment to parenting is deficient, since they were willing to risk imposing divorce on their children by their behavior, or 2) a spouse who imposes the burden of parental separation on the children by causing divorce should be penalized, not for the offensiveness of their conduct, but for the harm they caused their children by bringing about the divorce.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: Divorce; Child Custody; No Fault; Moral Intuition; Parenting

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 3, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Votruba, Ashley and Braver, Sanford L. and Ellman, Ira Mark and Fabricius, William V., Moral Intuitions About Fault, Parenting, and Child Custody after Divorce (October 31, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2348482 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2348482

Contact Information

Ashley Votruba (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Sanford L. Braver
Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology ( email )
Tempe, AZ 85287-1104
United States
Ira Mark Ellman
Arizona State University College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
480-965-2125 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.asu.edu/HomePages/Ellman/
Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology ( email )
Tempe, AZ 85287-1104
United States
William V. Fabricius
Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology ( email )
Tempe, AZ 85287-1104
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 263
Downloads: 43
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.500 seconds