Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2350316
 


 



Misconstruing Graham & Miller


Cara H. Drinan


Catholic University of America (CUA)

November 5, 2013

Washington University Law Review, Vol. 91, 2014

Abstract:     
In the last three years the Supreme Court has decreed a sea change in its juvenile Eighth Amendment jurisprudence. In particular, in its Graham v. Florida and Miller v. Alabama rulings, the Court struck down a majority of the states’ juvenile sentencing laws, outlawing life without parole for juveniles who commit non-homicide offenses and mandating individualized sentencing for those children who commit even the most serious crimes. An examination of state laws and sentencing practices, however, suggests that the Graham and Miller rulings have fallen on deaf ears. After briefly describing what these two decisions required of the states, in this Essay, I outline the many ways in which state actors have failed to comply with the Court’s mandate. Finally, I map out a path for future compliance that relies heavily upon the strength and agility of the executive branch.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: Graham, Miller, juvenile, sentencing, retroactivity, resentencing

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 9, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Drinan, Cara H., Misconstruing Graham & Miller (November 5, 2013). Washington University Law Review, Vol. 91, 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2350316

Contact Information

Cara Hope Drinan (Contact Author)
Catholic University of America (CUA) ( email )
116 McMahon Hall
Washington, DC 20064
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,292
Downloads: 404
Download Rank: 38,855

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds