Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2353061
 


 



A Market Approach to Regulating the Energy Revolution: Assurance Bonds, Insurance, and the Certain and Uncertain Risks of Hydraulic Fracturing


David A. Dana


Northwestern University - School of Law

Hannah Jacobs Wiseman


Florida State University - College of Law

November 11, 2013

Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 13-37
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 13-37

Abstract:     
The United States faces a critical moment in environmental regulation. As tens of thousands of new unconventional, hydraulically fractured oil and gas wells spring up around the United States, we face a long-term threat of significant soil and water contamination. The current patchwork of state "command and control" regulations fails to prevent this contamination. Even in states with updated rules, sloppy operations have caused contamination events. Furthermore, thousands of abandoned wells, which can leak pollutants, already dot our landscape, and these numbers could rise over time as operators drill and eventually abandon thousands of new wells each year.

Command and control regulations will be an important first step in preventing contamination but cannot address all risks, particularly those for which industry has more knowledge than agencies. These limitations call for a market-based approach of bonding requirements and mandatory environmental liability insurance. An insurance regime will incentivize the party with the most knowledge of risks — industry — to produce risk information, and it will spur third-party monitoring of risks by companies with a powerful monetary incentive to reduce claim events. Assurance bonds and insurance will also provide a pool of money to support later clean-up, which will be particularly important for disadvantaged areas that lack financial resources and political clout.

This Article proposes a market-based approach and responds to objections, and then explores the bottom-up, localities-as-leaders political economy by which bonding and insurance mandates are most likely to emerge and ultimately become established as a matter of state law. Without adequate bonding and insurance requirements, we risk creating a new wave of widespread, unaddressed pollution from the current energy revolution. As we stand at that this critical decision point, this Article proposes a better path forward.  

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: environmental law, energy law, oil and gas law, insurance law, bonds, and hydrofracturing or fracking

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K30, K32

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 13, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Dana, David A. and Wiseman, Hannah Jacobs, A Market Approach to Regulating the Energy Revolution: Assurance Bonds, Insurance, and the Certain and Uncertain Risks of Hydraulic Fracturing (November 11, 2013). Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 13-37; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 13-37. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2353061 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2353061

Contact Information

David A. Dana
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-0240 (Phone)
312-503-2035 (Fax)
Hannah Jacobs Wiseman (Contact Author)
Florida State University - College of Law ( email )
425 W. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32306
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 274
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 172,824

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.391 seconds