Judicial State Action: Shelley V. Kraemer, State Action, and Judicial Takings
Shelley Ross Saxer
Pepperdine University School of Law
Widener Law Journal, Vol. 21, p. 847, 2012
Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper
This essay will explore whether recognizing a judicial taking would also constitute an overhaul of the state action doctrine by potentially turning a judicial decision that uses common law to resolve private litigation into state action that requires just compensation for a Fifth Amendment taking. Applying the principle from several cases -- including Shelley v. Kraemer, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, Cohen v. Cowles Media Co., Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., and Georgia v. McCollum -- that "the action of the [s]tates to which the [a]mendment has reference includes action of state courts and state judicial officials" to state court decisions impacting property rights may, in the words of Justice Scalia in his dissent in McCollum, just be following a bad doctrine "logically to its illogical conclusion."
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41
Keywords: judicial taking, state action, Fifth Amendment, Takings Clause, real property, Shelley v. Kraemer, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, Cohen v. Cowles Media Co., Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., Georgia v. McCollumAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 15, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.500 seconds