Interpretation and Indeterminacy
Timothy A.O. Endicott
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law
November 9, 2013
Forthcoming, Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies
Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 96/2013
Legal interpretation is a reasoning process. It is needed whenever reasoning is needed in order to decide what a legal instrument means. I defend this approach through a critical discussion of the view that Andrei Marmor defends, in Philosophy of Law (2011), that legal interpretation is needed when the law is indeterminate. I also offer reasons for disagreeing with Marmor’s argument that H.P.Grice’s ‘cooperative principle’ does not generally apply in legal discourse. The content of the law made by legislation includes what the legislation asserts, and also those implicatures that courts have conclusive reason to act upon, in light of the cooperative principle.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: interpretation, indeterminacy, implicatures, pragmatics, Griceworking papers series
Date posted: November 20, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.484 seconds