Are Consumer-Oriented Rules the New Frontier of Trade Liberalization?
Sonia E. Rolland
Northeastern University - School of Law; Georgetown University Law Center
November 18, 2013
Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 361-419 (2014)
Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper No. 165-2013
Lead paint toys and tainted baby formula milk from China, along with other scares involving consumer goods, have focused the public’s attention on the risks of a global supply chain that no state controls. Yet, domestic instruments available to protect consumers against unsafe or undesirable foreign goods and services are limited.
This article explores, from a comparative legal perspective, what shapes international trade regimes to be more or less consumer-oriented, using primarily EU law as a counterpoint to the WTO, but also NAFTA and MERCOSUR. Ultimately, the article suggests that the WTO’s producer-centered liberalization focus leaves consumers underserved and seeks to articulate a more holistic understanding of the trade liberalization project that accounts both for producer and consumer interests. Although the WTO may not be the appropriate or optimal forum to fulfill such needs, a more robust examination of the intersection between producer-oriented trade rules and consumer interests is warranted.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 60
JEL Classification: F13, K33Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 20, 2013 ; Last revised: November 26, 2014
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.485 seconds