Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=235744
 
 

Citations (6)



 


 



Informal Aggregation: Procedural and Ethical Implications of Coordination Among Counsel in Related Lawsuits


Howard M. Erichson


Fordham University School of Law


Duke Law Journal, Vol. 50, p. 381, 2000

Abstract:     
Even when related claims are not formally aggregated through any procedural mechanism such as joinder, class action, consolidation, or multidistrict litigation transfer, the lawyers involved in the separate lawsuits often work closely together. They coordinate their efforts to such an extent, in many cases, as to amount to a treatment of the litigation as a single, integrated whole. Such "informal aggregation" raises important questions about the boundaries of a dispute and the boundaries of the lawyer-client relationship.

The article examines this phenomenon of lawyer coordination in related lawsuits. As an ethical matter, the central question is whether a lawyer, by virtue of coordinated efforts with another lawyer, owes any ethical or fiduciary duties to that other lawyer's client. Looking at confidentiality, loyalty, conflicts of interest, and malpractice, the article suggests that ethical safeguards for clients of coordinating lawyers are neither strong enough nor explicit enough to provide adequate protection to such clients, and the problem is inherent in the nature of informal aggregation. Written cooperation agreements, however, alleviate some of the risks. As a procedural matter, a critical question is whether counsel coordination provides a valid basis for nonparty preclusion. The article considers the "virtual representation" argument that nonparties may be bound by a judgment if the lawyers worked closely together, and concludes that informal aggregation generally cannot justify binding a nonparty with a judgment.

Based on the inadequacy of ethical safeguards and lack of nonparty preclusion, combined with the decline in litigant autonomy that accompanies counsel coordination, the article contends that the rise in informal aggregation suggests the need for more thorough formal mechanisms for aggregating related claims, or at least, greater attention to formalizing counsel coordination through written agreements that make explicit the relationships among lawyers, clients, and lawsuits.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 92

Keywords: informal aggregation, joinder, complex litigation, counsel coordination, virtual representation, nonparty preclusion, joint defense

JEL Classification: K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 7, 2000 ; Last revised: June 25, 2008

Suggested Citation

Erichson, Howard M., Informal Aggregation: Procedural and Ethical Implications of Coordination Among Counsel in Related Lawsuits. Duke Law Journal, Vol. 50, p. 381, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=235744

Contact Information

Howard M. Erichson (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
646-312-8233 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 823
Downloads: 51
Download Rank: 221,457
Citations:  6

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.515 seconds