Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2357797
 


 



Doctrine in Context


Douglas NeJaime


University of California, Irvine School of Law

2013

127 Harvard Law Review Forum 10
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-156

Abstract:     
In Windsor and Brown: Marriage Equality and Racial Equality, Professor Michael Klarman convincingly argues that the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor “became conceivable only because of enormous changes in the surrounding social and political contexts.” In emphasizing external over internal factors, Klarman claims that “doctrine played little role in the outcome[] of . . . Windsor.” Yet this response argues that doctrine — and more specifically the mobilization and construction of doctrine in lower courts and in nonjudicial domains — contributed to the result in Windsor by shaping the legal and political context in which the Court intervened. LGBT advocates leveraged heightened scrutiny to pressure elected officials and convince lower court judges to support the marriage equality cause. In doing so, they shaped the backdrop against which the Court resolved the issue in Windsor, even though the Windsor opinion offered no analysis of heightened scrutiny. Even if, as Klarman suggests, doctrine does little to constrain the Justices in landmark Supreme Court decisions, doctrine plays a significant role outside and below the Court. Ultimately, doctrine shapes the environment that Klarman convincingly shows influences the Justices in cases like Windsor.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: doctrine, constitutional law, constitutional theory, backlash, adjudication, same-sex marriage, Windsor, DOMA

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 21, 2013 ; Last revised: November 22, 2013

Suggested Citation

NeJaime, Douglas, Doctrine in Context (2013). 127 Harvard Law Review Forum 10; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-156. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2357797

Contact Information

Douglas NeJaime (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
535A Administration
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 152
Downloads: 37

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds