Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=235862
 
 

Citations



 


 



Double Trouble: Legal Solutions to the Medical Problems of Unconsented Sperm Harvesting and Drug-Induced Multiple Pregnancies


Ronald Chester


New England Law | Boston


St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 44, P. 451, 2000

Abstract:     
In two previous articles concerning the relation of the law to
problems of assisted conception, Professor Chester considered
legislation as a means of addressing the difficulties presented. These articles considered posthumous reproduction (33 Houston L. Rev. 967) and human whole-body cloning (49 Florida L. Rev. 303). In response to legislative inaction in the assisted conception field, Professor Chester's current article considers other forms of non-governmental regulation, including self-regulation by the medical profession, regulation by insurance companies, and private actions, chiefly in tort and contract, against doctors and fertility clinics. The article, "Double Trouble: Legal Solutions to the Medical Problems of Unconsented Sperm Harvesting and Drug-Induced Multiple Pregnancies" (44 St. Louis U. L. J. 451 (2000)) addresses the two problems indicated by the title in the title in light of the methods of regulation mentioned above.

Professor Chester concludes that unconsented sperm harvesting from dead or comatose males may involve several forms of tortious behavior (and in the case of the comatose male, breaches of both fiduciary duty and contract by the doctor), but also that potential damages do not seem either certain enough or high enough to significantly interest the private bar. However, interested parties may be able to obtain injunctive relief, if not against the actual harvesting of the sperm, then at least against its use. In the latter case, for example, expectant, living heirs may be able to stop the conception of additional claimants to the male's estate. Chester also discusses regulation by the medical profession and by the insurance industry and finds such regulation largely ineffective.

On the other hand, overstimulation by drugs of the ovaries of women unable to conceive, which stimulation causes troublesome and expensive multiple pregnancies, may trigger causes of action, particularly in tort, with damages sufficient to interest the private bar. In addition, although medical self-regulation has proved largely ineffective, health insurers may themselves regulate such procedures if, as projected, injuries to the mother (and in some ways to the father) and the production of multiple unhealthy offspring cause insurance costs to soar.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: July 26, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Chester, Ronald, Double Trouble: Legal Solutions to the Medical Problems of Unconsented Sperm Harvesting and Drug-Induced Multiple Pregnancies. St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 44, P. 451, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=235862

Contact Information

Ronald Chester (Contact Author)
New England Law | Boston ( email )
154 Stuart St.
Boston, MA 02116
United States
617-422-7254 (Phone)
617-422-7453 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 667

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds