'Fair is Foul, and Foul is Fair.' The Supreme Court's Most Famous and Infamous Decisions on Diversity

13 Pages Posted: 27 Nov 2013

See all articles by Stefan Graziadei

Stefan Graziadei

University of Graz; University of Antwerp - Research Group Law & Government

Date Written: October 22, 2013

Abstract

Generally, few people recall or want to recall that the evils of race discrimination were reaffirmed through the law and the jurisprudence of state courts and the Supreme Court. In these decisions, law was not the implementation of justice, but of injustice. The infamous decisions of the Supreme Court can be compared to the words of the witches in Shakespeare’s Macbeth, when they announce that "Fair is foul and foul is fair". The wrong values were thus upheld by the law. In the twentieth century, in a swing of the pendulum, the Supreme Court has arguably become, with the civil rights movement, one of the most important players in American politics actively tackling race discrimination by overturning its infamous precedents. This paper takes a look at this evolution by examining three most infamous decisions of the Supreme Court and the judgments that have overturned them.

Keywords: constitutional law, supreme court, diversity, multiculturalism, minorities, jurisprudence, justice

Suggested Citation

Graziadei, Stefan, 'Fair is Foul, and Foul is Fair.' The Supreme Court's Most Famous and Infamous Decisions on Diversity (October 22, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2359997 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2359997

University of Antwerp - Research Group Law & Government ( email )

Venusstraat 23
Antwerpen, 2000
Belgium

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
820
PlumX Metrics