Monstrous Wickedness and the Judgment of Knight

Penny Crofts

University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Law

December 2013

Griffith Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2012
UTS: Law Research Paper No. 2013/9

In February 2000, Katherine Mary Knight killed, then skinned, decapitated and cooked her lover in rural Australia. Knight pleaded guilty to murder and received a life sentence, against which she unsuccessfully appealed in Knight v R (2006) NSWCCA 292. I consider the way in which the majority judgments organised and expressed Knightʼs culpability in accordance with a model of monstrous wickedness, arguing that models of wickedness articulated and applied in criminal law should be evaluated critically. The judgment of the court constructed and responded to Knight as bad, a monster who is (and will always be) dangerous (especially to men) and ultimately irredeemable. Not only do monsters justify and require extreme measures, they also contaminate and undermine systems of orders – the judgments of Knight thus read more consistently with the genre of horror than that of law. The model of monstrous wickedness ostensibly works particularly well for women who kill, as it preserves the lawʼs tendency to organise women as lacking agency. However, this model also generates a clash of binaries when applied to women. The monster/victim binary ascribes agency to the monster, generating difficulties for the law to reconcile the notion of a female monster with legal assumptions of the absence of female agency. This results in the problem of the female monster. The judicial creation of a horror movie monster that lacks basic humanity facilitates an abdication of the legal (and moral) task of judging a human being as human.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: criminal law, wickeness, monsters, feminism

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 27, 2013 ; Last revised: December 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Crofts, Penny, Monstrous Wickedness and the Judgment of Knight (December 2013). Griffith Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2012; UTS: Law Research Paper No. 2013/9. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2360395

Contact Information

Penny Crofts (Contact Author)
University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Law ( email )

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 184
Downloads: 27

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.391 seconds