Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2360687
 


 



New Technologies and Constitutional Law


Thomas Fetzer


University of Mannheim - Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, Regulierungsrecht und Steuerrecht; Mannheim Centre for Competition and Innovation

Christopher S. Yoo


University of Pennsylvania Law School; University of Pennsylvania - Annenberg School for Communication; University of Pennsylvania - School of Engineering and Applied Science

2012

Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law 485 (Mark Tushnet, Thomas Fleiner, Cheryl Saunders, eds., 2013)
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 13-30

Abstract:     
One of the most controversial issues among legal academics is the extent to which constitutional interpretation should adjust to reflect contemporary values. What has received less attention is the extent which changes in constitutional interpretation are driven not by shifts in political mores, but rather by new developments in technology. This chapter provides three examples of how technological change can affect law. First, technology can undercut existing law, as demonstrated by how the shift to digital and Internet-based transmission has undermined the rationales traditional for applying a relaxed standard of free speech to broadcast television. Second, technology can create pressure to modify existing law, illustrated by how protections against search and seizure have adapted to the advent of global positioning systems (GPS). Third, technology can provoke the creation of new constitutional rights, exemplified by the German courts’ recognition of constitutional protection against remote online searches of computers. These developments also raise important questions whether courts or legislatures are better suited to deal with this fast-changing environment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: Comparative constitutional law, technological innovation, German Basic Law, freedom of speech, communications, government regulation, broadcast spectrum, content regulation, Fourth Amendment, surveillance, expectations of privacy, remote online searches of personal computers, legislatures, courts

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 15, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Fetzer, Thomas and Yoo, Christopher S., New Technologies and Constitutional Law (2012). Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law 485 (Mark Tushnet, Thomas Fleiner, Cheryl Saunders, eds., 2013); U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 13-30. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2360687

Contact Information

Thomas Fetzer
University of Mannheim - Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, Regulierungsrecht und Steuerrecht ( email )
Mannheim, 68131
Germany
HOME PAGE: http://www.taxlaw.uni-mannheim.de/
Mannheim Centre for Competition and Innovation ( email )
L 7, 1
Mannheim, 68131
Germany
HOME PAGE: http://www.macci-mannheim.eu/
Christopher S. Yoo (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204
United States
(215) 746-8772 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.upenn.edu/faculty/csyoo/
University of Pennsylvania - Annenberg School for Communication ( email )
3620 Walnut St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6220
United States
(215) 746-8772 (Phone)
University of Pennsylvania - School of Engineering and Applied Science ( email )
3330 Walnut St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6309
United States
(215) 746-8772 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 253
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 150,220

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.500 seconds