Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2360723
 


 



A Theory of Pleading, Litigation, and Settlement


William H. J. Hubbard


University of Chicago Law School

January 23, 2014

University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 663
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 446

Abstract:     
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal are the most important cases on pleading in fifty years. A large literature argues that these cases have raised pleading standards, empowered federal judges as the gatekeepers to federal court, and undermined the “liberal ethos” of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This understanding of pleading doctrine has in turn led to predictions of dramatic effects on dismissal rates, particularly for claims, such as employment discrimination claims, where plaintiffs often lack knowledge of the defendant’s intent at the outset of the case. The accumulating empirical evidence, however, confounds these predictions. Why have the most significant pleading cases in 50 years had virtually no statistically significant effects? Why, in an era of heightened pleading, do defendants file motions to dismiss in only 6 percent of cases? Why have employment discrimination cases been largely unaffected by Twombly and Iqbal? To explain these puzzles, I develop a new theory of pleading, in which pleading practices are not driven by pleading rules and doctrine, but by litigation strategy, and in particular the use of detailed pleadings to precipitate early settlement. I argue that even in a world with no motions to dismiss, we should expect detailed, plausible pleadings to be the norm. I conclude by arguing that Twombly and Iqbal advance rather than weaken the “liberal ethos” of the Federal Rules. Viewed in this light, Twombly and Iqbal point us to a crucial margin on which they may — or may not — have had a hard-to-detect but potentially important effect: with respect to a small, but disproportionately expensive, set of cases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 29, 2013 ; Last revised: January 24, 2014

Suggested Citation

Hubbard, William H. J., A Theory of Pleading, Litigation, and Settlement (January 23, 2014). University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 663; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 446. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2360723 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2360723

Contact Information

William H. J. Hubbard (Contact Author)
University of Chicago Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 464
Downloads: 171
Download Rank: 100,592

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds