Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2360756
 


 



Humans and Humans+: Technological Enhancement and Criminal Responsibility


Susan W. Brenner


University of Dayton - School of Law

July 27, 2012

Boston University journal of Science and Technology Law, Vol. 19, 2013, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
This article examines the implications our use of technological enhancements to improve our physical and/or cognitive abilities will necessarily have on the processes of imposing criminal responsibility on those who victimize others. It explains that while our use of such enhancements is still in its infancy, it is more than likely that their use will dramatically accelerate over the next century or less.

The articles examines how law has historically approached the concept of a “legal person,” with reference to “normal” humans, “abnormal” humans, animals, objects, supernatural beings and juristic persons. It also reviews how two other authors have analyzed the general legal issues our use of enhancements and other technological advancements are likely to raise.

The primary focus of the article, however, is on analyzing how criminal law will need to adapt once our world is populated by two classes of humans: Standard humans (basic Homo sapiens sapiens) and Enhanced humans (Homo sapiens sapiens whose native abilities have been augmented beyond the range of possibilities for their Standard brethren). I assume this very basic divergence between humans because it suffices for my analyses, and because I assume that creating a new species or subspecies of Homo sapiens sapiens is likely to be difficult and will therefore not eventuate in the near future.

I use various scenarios, e.g., Standard perpetrator-Enhanced victim, Enhanced-perpetrator and Standard victim, to analyze how criminal law can, and should, adapt to a world in which all humans are not equal. I use statutory rape statutes as an example of law that is designed to protect a distinct and vulnerable class of humans, and speculate as to whether this approach could be extrapolated to Standard humans. I also explore the viability of extrapolating other, similar principles, such as vulnerable victims, into this context. And I briefly analyze the possibility that future law might address this situation by implementing a caste system to “protect” Standard humans from their superior counterparts. My goal is not to predict how future criminal law should deal with human enhancement but to note the likelihood that it will have to do so.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Keywords: Humans, enhancement, technology, crime, responsibility, law

JEL Classification: K10, K14, K40, K42

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 28, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Brenner, Susan W., Humans and Humans+: Technological Enhancement and Criminal Responsibility (July 27, 2012). Boston University journal of Science and Technology Law, Vol. 19, 2013, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2360756

Contact Information

Susan W. Brenner (Contact Author)
University of Dayton - School of Law ( email )
300 College Park
Dayton, OH 45469
United States
937-229-2929 (Phone)
937-229-2469 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 104
Downloads: 20

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds