Sovereign Pari Passu and the Litigators of the Lost Cause
November 28, 2013
The pari passu saga isn’t about the pari passu clause. A year on from Argentina’s first defeat in a US appeals court, it has become a wider debate about ‘recalcitrant’ sovereign debtors, broad use of courts’ powers of equity in bond contract cases, and ratable payment itself. A recent copycat pari passu lawsuit against Grenada demonstrates these points well — testing the limits of ‘recalcitrance’, but still not finding firm answers. This provokes one or two questions. Was the pari passu ‘cause’ actually worth it? Despite its apparent success for pre-judgment holdouts, litigation is likely to remain lengthy and tangled up with negotiation. Will it be more useful for post-judgment creditors to instead use to sue everyone? And will ‘fixing’ the saga simply be a matter of redrafting the clause?
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12working papers series
Date posted: November 30, 2013
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.453 seconds