Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2361495
 


 



Unteachable: Shelby County, Canonical Apostasies, and a Way Forward for the Voting Rights Act


Kareem U. Crayton


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Terry Smith


DePaul College of Law

March 31, 2014

Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2014

Abstract:     
In this paper, we analyze the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder, which declared unconstitutional the coverage formula for Section 5 preclearance. We conclude that Shelby County is a radical departure not only from the Supreme Court's Voting Rights Act jurisprudence but also from canons of statutory construction more generally. While the Court's decision has adverse implications for both separation of powers doctrine and minority voting rights, the authors propose an expeditious fix to the coverage formula that would likely pass constitutional muster.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: Voting Rights Act, Statutory Interpretation, Separation of Powers, federalism, civil rights


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 30, 2013 ; Last revised: October 23, 2014

Suggested Citation

Crayton, Kareem U. and Smith, Terry, Unteachable: Shelby County, Canonical Apostasies, and a Way Forward for the Voting Rights Act (March 31, 2014). Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2361495 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2361495

Contact Information

Kareem U. Crayton
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Terry Smith (Contact Author)
DePaul College of Law ( email )
25 E. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,888
Downloads: 181
Download Rank: 124,974

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds