Unteachable: Shelby County, Canonical Apostasies, and a Way Forward for the Voting Rights Act
Kareem U. Crayton
affiliation not provided to SSRN
DePaul College of Law
March 31, 2014
Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2014
In this paper, we analyze the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder, which declared unconstitutional the coverage formula for Section 5 preclearance. We conclude that Shelby County is a radical departure not only from the Supreme Court's Voting Rights Act jurisprudence but also from canons of statutory construction more generally. While the Court's decision has adverse implications for both separation of powers doctrine and minority voting rights, the authors propose an expeditious fix to the coverage formula that would likely pass constitutional muster.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: Voting Rights Act, Statutory Interpretation, Separation of Powers, federalism, civil rights
Date posted: November 30, 2013 ; Last revised: October 23, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.484 seconds