Unteachable: Shelby County, Canonical Apostasies, and Ways Forward for the Voting Rights Act
Kareem U. Crayton
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law
DePaul College of Law
March 31, 2014
In this paper, we analyze the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder, which declared unconstitutional the coverage formula for Section 5 preclearance. We conclude that Shelby County is a radical departure not only from the Supreme Court's Voting Rights Act jurisprudence but also from canons of statutory construction more generally. While the Court's decision has adverse implications for both separation of powers doctrine and minority voting rights, the authors propose an expeditious fix to the coverage formula that would likely pass constitutional muster.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 72
Keywords: Voting Rights Act, Statutory Interpretation, Separation of Powersworking papers series
Date posted: November 30, 2013 ; Last revised: May 2, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.313 seconds