Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=236401
 
 

Citations (88)



 
 

Footnotes (42)



 


 



A Theory of Systemic Risk and Design of Prudential Bank Regulation


Viral V. Acharya


New York University - Leonard N. Stern School of Business; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); New York University (NYU) - Department of Finance

January 9, 2001



Abstract:     
We examine the regulatory design problem of a central bank whose objective is to ensure an optimal level of individual as well as systemic risk of bank failure in an economy with possibly heterogeneous banks. We model systemic risk as the endogenously chosen correlation of returns on assets held by different banks. We demonstrate that in the presence of a negative externality of one bank's failure on the health of other banks, there is a systemic risk-shifting incentive where all banks undertake correlated investments. Thus, there is risk-shifting at the individual bank level as well as at the aggregate level. The latter phenomenon leads to systemic risk in the economy.

Current regulation is based only on a bank's own risk and ignores the externalities of the bank's actions. Such regulation may leave the collective risk-shifting incentive unattended, and can, in fact, accentuate systemic risk. We show that a policy of unconditionally bailing out failed banks eliminates the strategic benefit to the surviving banks, and in turn, eliminates the ex-ante incentive of banks to make uncorrelated investments. Similarly, a policy that exhibits greater forbearance towards banks upon joint failure than in individual failures has a negative feedback effect and induces banks to undertake correlated investments.

Prudential regulation should thus operate at a collective level, and regulate each bank as a function of its joint risk with other banks as well. We show that optimal regulation consists of (i) a rescue policy that conducts bail out of only the 'essential' or 'too-big-to-fail' banks OR conducts bank sales upon individual failures and exhibits little forbearance (if any) upon joint failure; and (ii) a capital adequacy requirement that is increasing in the individual risk of each bank as well as in the correlation of banks' risks.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: Systemic risk, Risk-shifting, Capital adequacy, Bank regulation, Banking

JEL Classification: G21, G28, G38, E58, D62

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 10, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Acharya, Viral V., A Theory of Systemic Risk and Design of Prudential Bank Regulation (January 9, 2001). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=236401 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.236401

Contact Information

Viral V. Acharya (Contact Author)
New York University - Leonard N. Stern School of Business ( email )
44 West 4th Street
New York, NY NY 10012
United States
HOME PAGE: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~sternfin/vacharya/public_html/~vacharya.htm
Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
77 Bastwick Street
London, EC1V 3PZ
United Kingdom
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
New York University (NYU) - Department of Finance
Stern School of Business
44 West 4th Street
New York, NY 10012-1126
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 9,294
Downloads: 3,032
Download Rank: 827
Citations:  88
Footnotes:  42

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.328 seconds