Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2364047
 


 



When Quacking Like a Duck is Really a Swan Song in Disguise: How Windsor's Federalism Analysis Sets the Stage for the Demise of Federalism-Based Marriage Discrimination


Nancy C. Marcus


Indiana Tech Law School

December 5, 2013

CWRU Law Review Same-Sex Marriage Symposium Issue (Forthcoming)

Abstract:     
United States v. Windsor may, in the views of some, walk and talk like a federalist duck, but upon closer examination, the decision is not a federalist decision at all, but is, rather, a swan song for federalist-based marriage discrimination.

Leading up to Windsor, federalist-based arguments for marriage equality were advocated by late twentieth-century minimalist movement, which viewed the judiciary as an ineffective agent of social change, and urged the narrowest of constitutional claims, pessimistic about the likelihood of broad individual rights claims to same-sex marriage rights. After Windsor’s release, some have interpreted it as being a federalist decision, due in part to the opinion’s inclusion of a state powers discussion.

This Article describes both how backlash-fearing minimalists were wrong, and how those who read Windsor as a federalist decision are wrong. The Article details an evolution in LGBT rights advocacy from backlash-fearing minimalism to a renewed faith in the courts serving an important role in the protection of constitutional rights. Finally, the Article offers alternative readings of Windsor’s state powers discussion in light of the passage’s surrounding language, including the Court’s pointed invocation of Loving v. Virginia as an applicable federalism-limiting precedent. Whether the state powers discussion in Windsor is read cynically as strategic rhetorical maneuvering or more generously, the decision does not in any sense leave marriage equality up to the states to decide, but rather builds the latest layer of a growing foundation for the ultimate affirmation of same-sex marriage rights by the Supreme Court.

Keywords: Windsor, minimalism, federalism, 5th Amendment, same-sex marriage, LGBT, marriage quality, The Hollow Hope, jurisprudence, substantive due process, equal protection, equal liberty, liberty

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: December 7, 2013 ; Last revised: October 5, 2014

Suggested Citation

Marcus, Nancy C., When Quacking Like a Duck is Really a Swan Song in Disguise: How Windsor's Federalism Analysis Sets the Stage for the Demise of Federalism-Based Marriage Discrimination (December 5, 2013). CWRU Law Review Same-Sex Marriage Symposium Issue (Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2364047

Contact Information

Nancy C. Marcus (Contact Author)
Indiana Tech Law School ( email )
1600 E. Washington Blvd.
Ft. Wayne, IN 46803
United States
2604225561 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.indianatech.edu
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 145

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds