Opinions First - Argument Afterwards

Daniel J. Bussel

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

December 5, 2013

61 UCLA Law Review, 2014, Forthcoming
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 13-40

For twenty-five years, the California Supreme Court has operated under a bizarre internal operating procedure that requires majority opinions to be written and agreed to prior to oral argument. This procedure squanders and demeans the parties’ formal opportunity for appellate argument, is inconsistent with traditional common law appellate process, and violates the state and federal Constitutions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: California Supreme Court, judicial opinions, judicial procedure, constitutional law, appellate process

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: December 7, 2013 ; Last revised: April 11, 2014

Suggested Citation

Bussel, Daniel J., Opinions First - Argument Afterwards (December 5, 2013). 61 UCLA Law Review, 2014, Forthcoming; UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 13-40. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2364110

Contact Information

Daniel J. Bussel (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-7977 (Phone)
310-825-6023 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 117
Downloads: 53
Download Rank: 217,557

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds