Inflationary Trends in Law and Development
Benjamin van Rooij
University of California, Irvine School of Law; Leiden University - Leiden Law School
Melbourne Law School
December 13, 2013
Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 2014, Forthcoming
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2014-5
This paper analyses two seemingly contradictory trends in the study and practice of law and development. First it looks at the ever higher rising level of expectations and ambitions about what law can do for development. And second it looks at the increasingly vocal critique and frustration both from inside and outside the field that law often fails to achieve the desired developmental effects. The paper argues that there is a relationship between increasing ambition and lack of impact. Increasing ambition produces limited impacts, but ironically lack of impact creates recommendations to increase ambition. The paper concludes that this linked evolution originates first from forces outside of the law and development domain, such as increasing pressures on aid efficacy, shifts in developmental paradigms, and increased geo-political pressures to bring law into post-conflict states and peace building. However, the relationship between ambition and lack of impact is also internal to the field. Scholars and practitioners, we suggest, operate cyclically criticizing existing practices to launch new and often bolder developments. The paper calls for a break from these cycles, a return to basic interventions to make incremental improvement in the functioning of law in the context of development, and shift from lofty overarching paradigms that obscure and disappoint, rather than aid, development.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45
Keywords: law and development, legal empowerment, access to justice, rule of law, transitional justice, customary law
JEL Classification: K10
Date posted: December 15, 2013 ; Last revised: March 18, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.204 seconds