Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2367476
 


 



Tentative Oral Opinions: Improving Oral Argument Without Spending a Dime


Joshua Stein


Yale University - Law School

December 13, 2013

Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Spring 2013)

Abstract:     
This article explores use of the tentative opinion, two types of which were pioneered by California appellate courts. In 1990, the Second Division of California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal (which sits in Riverside) began disseminating written draft opinions in advance of oral argument. The measure received acclaim from appellate advocates, but did not beget imitation by other courts. In late 2011, however, an appellate court in Los Angeles (the Eighth Division of the Second District) began issuing tentative opinions orally at the beginning of argument. This approach, referred to here as the “oral tentative,” represents an attractive alternative to the written version, which has failed to catch on in other courts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: appellate procedure, appeals, tentative opinions, oral argument

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 15, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Stein, Joshua, Tentative Oral Opinions: Improving Oral Argument Without Spending a Dime (December 13, 2013). Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Spring 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2367476

Contact Information

Joshua Stein (Contact Author)
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 601
Downloads: 87
Download Rank: 171,946

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds