Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=237020
 
 

Citations (11)



 
 

Footnotes (236)



 


 



Explaining Variation in Takeover Defenses: Failure in the Corporate Law Market


John C. Coates, IV


Harvard Law School

June 26, 2000

Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 297

Abstract:     
Companies adopt varying takeover defenses prior to IPOs, contrary to simple agency-cost models. Variation in defenses is explained in large part by the quality of legal services provided to entrepreneurs and pre-IPO managers. Data from 320 IPOs in 1991-92 and 1998 show that companies advised by larger law firms with more takeover experience adopt more defenses. In 1991-92, companies with Silicon Valley lawyers adopted almost no defenses; by 1998, Silicon Valley lawyer clients were as likely to use defenses as other lawyers. Companies with high-quality underwriters and venture capital backing are more likely to adopt defenses, and the overall rate of defense adoption increased in the 1990s. Dual class capital structures appear to be distinct, and motivated by non-pecuniary private benefits of control. Together, these findings suggest that, except for dual class structures, defenses are generally optimal at the IPO stage, but not all clients receive that advice from their lawyers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 121

JEL Classification: G32, G34, K22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 12, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Coates, IV, John C., Explaining Variation in Takeover Defenses: Failure in the Corporate Law Market (June 26, 2000). Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 297. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=237020 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.237020

Contact Information

John C. Coates (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,550
Downloads: 1,242
Download Rank: 7,497
Citations:  11
Footnotes:  236
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.438 seconds