Imperfect Competition in Selection Markets
University of Chicago Booth School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
E. Glen Weyl
Microsoft Research New England; University of Chicago
September 23, 2014
Standard policies to correct market power and selection can be misguided when these two forces co-exist. Using a calibrated model of employer-sponsored health insurance, we show that the risk adjustment commonly used by employers to offset adverse selection often reduces the amount of high-quality coverage and thus social surplus. Conversely, in a model of subprime auto lending calibrated to Einav, Jenkins and Levin (2012), realistic levels of competition among lenders generate a significant oversupply of credit, implying greater market power is desirable. These results motivate a general model of symmetric imperfect competition in selection markets that parameterizes the degree of both market power and selection. We use graphical price-theoretic reasoning to comprehensively characterize the interaction between selection and imperfect competition. Our results imply that in selection markets four principles of the United States Horizontal Merger Guidelines are often reversed.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 57
Keywords: selection market, imperfect competition, mergers, risk adjustment, risk-based pricing
JEL Classification: D42, D43, D82, I13, L10, L41working papers series
Date posted: December 30, 2013 ; Last revised: September 24, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.453 seconds