Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2373277
 


 



Justice Scalia's Truthiness and the Virtues of Judicial Candor


Allen Rostron


University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law

December 3, 2013

89 Indiana Law Journal Supplement 12 (2013)

Abstract:     
Antonin Scalia is by far the Supreme Court’s greatest wit and most colorful personality. His judicial opinions are also remarkably passionate and frank. He has received intense criticism for supposedly being “too political” in some of his opinions, such as his scorching dissent in last year’s case about Arizona laws aimed at illegal immigrants or his bitter denunciation of the Court’s last major ruling on the detention of suspected terrorists. But what purpose is really served by judges hiding their motivations behind a false veneer of detachment and stilted formalism? Scalia can be so refreshingly candid in his judicial work that it pains me when I see his opposite tendency emerge in other contexts, such as in his response to criticism of the Court's handling of the Bush v. Gore election controversy or in his evasion of responsibility for his remarks about the 14th Amendment's applicability to gender discrimination. If there is anyone in a position of great power in htis country who has the freedom to speak plain truths, it is Scalia and his fellow members of the Supreme Court. If they really want to be persuasive, they might find that straight talk goes a lot further than spin.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: Supreme Court, justices, judges, courts, Scalia, judicial candor

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 1, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Rostron, Allen, Justice Scalia's Truthiness and the Virtues of Judicial Candor (December 3, 2013). 89 Indiana Law Journal Supplement 12 (2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2373277

Contact Information

Allen K. Rostron (Contact Author)
University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law ( email )
5100 Rockhill Road
Kansas City, MO 64110-2499
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 142
Downloads: 42

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds