Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2374910
 


 



Dead Law Walking: The Surprising Tenacity of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines


Frank O. Bowman III


University of Missouri School of Law

January 5, 2014

51 Houston L. Rev. __ (2014), Forthcoming
University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-06

Abstract:     
This Article takes a statistical look at the state of federal sentencing roughly a decade after United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared the Federal Sentencing Guidelines constitutionally dead, and in its next breath resurrected them in advisory form. The Booker transformation has engendered endless procedural wrangles and has unquestionably altered thousands of individual sentencing outcomes. Yet, from the points of view of federal defendants in the mass and of the system that processes them from arrest to prison gate, perhaps the most surprising fact about Booker is how small an effect it has actually had. Despite a continuing systemic drift away from strict guidelines compliance, the Guidelines continue to exercise a dominant influence on the sentences imposed on the overwhelming majority of federal defendants. And the broad-gauge judicial revolt against the severity of guidelines-driven sentences that many anticipated has been muted at best. This Article examines the tenacity of the Guidelines regime and considers its implications for those who practice in the federal courts and those who aspire to change federal sentencing outcomes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: federal sentencing guidelines, blakely, booker, gall, kimbrough, criminal law, federal criminal law, sentencing, federal sentencing, disparity, sentencing commission

JEL Classification: K1, K14, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 6, 2014 ; Last revised: February 1, 2014

Suggested Citation

Bowman III, Frank O., Dead Law Walking: The Surprising Tenacity of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (January 5, 2014). 51 Houston L. Rev. __ (2014), Forthcoming; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2374910

Contact Information

Frank O. Bowman III (Contact Author)
University of Missouri School of Law ( email )
Missouri Avenue & Conley Avenue
Columbia, MO 65211
United States
573-882-2749 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 202
Downloads: 61
Download Rank: 209,074

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.344 seconds