Does the First Amendment Bar Cancellation of Redskins?

Jeffrey Lefstin

Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2000

In this note, Jeffrey Lefstin examines the First Amendment implications of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's decision to cancel the trademarks of the Washington Redskins. He concludes that if analyzed under the Supreme Court's current commercial speech doctrine, the cancellation would almost certainly be held to violate the Redskins' First Amendment rights. However, Lefstin argues that the trademarks' lack of informational content renders commercial speech doctrine largely irrelevant to the First Amendment analysis. He proceeds to explore unconstitutional conditions and public forum analyses, which do not depend on the trademarks' informational content. Nonetheless, Lefstin finds that the cancellation is likely unconstitutional under these doctrines as well.

Not Available For Download

Date posted: September 17, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Lefstin, Jeffrey, Does the First Amendment Bar Cancellation of Redskins?. Stanford Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=237576

Contact Information

Jeffrey Lefstin (Contact Author)
Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP ( email )
Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3834
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,061

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds