Does the First Amendment Bar Cancellation of Redskins?
Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP
Stanford Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2000
In this note, Jeffrey Lefstin examines the First Amendment implications of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's decision to cancel the trademarks of the Washington Redskins. He concludes that if analyzed under the Supreme Court's current commercial speech doctrine, the cancellation would almost certainly be held to violate the Redskins' First Amendment rights. However, Lefstin argues that the trademarks' lack of informational content renders commercial speech doctrine largely irrelevant to the First Amendment analysis. He proceeds to explore unconstitutional conditions and public forum analyses, which do not depend on the trademarks' informational content. Nonetheless, Lefstin finds that the cancellation is likely unconstitutional under these doctrines as well.
Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 17, 2000
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds