Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2375785
 


 



Transfer Pricing: UN Practical Manual – China


Richard Thompson Ainsworth


Boston University - School of Law; NYU - Graduate Tax Program

Andrew Shact


Boston University - School of Law

January 6, 2014

Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-1

Abstract:     
Any contemporary Chinese transfer pricing assessment needs to consider the United Nation (UN) Practical Manual on Transfer Pricing for Developing Countries released in May 2013. In particular, Chapter 10 discusses Country Practices and presents China’s most up to date transfer pricing policy statement.

China is not an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member nor has it formally adopted the OECD’s Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations. Chapter 10 makes it very clear that China is charting a different transfer pricing course in at least nine important areas. China believes that: 1. significant comparability adjustments are needed when comparable sets are drawn from developed countries; 2. the transactional net margin (TNMM) is considered overused and inaccurate; 3. location savings must be reflected in the costs; 4. toll manufacturers will be converted into contract manufacturers; 5. limited risk distributor status is denied for brand building distributors; 6. market premiums must be reflected in Chinese profits; 7. tax haven based IP ownership can be “looked through” or denied; 8. cost-plus methodology is rejected for “high and new technology status” (HNTS) entities; 9. royalty adjustments over time are necessary.

The Chinese approach to transfer pricing or at least the approach presented in the Practical Manual uses familiar OECD terminology but it places a very different emphasis on some basic concepts in the OECD Guidelines.

Thus, the Chinese market economics strengthens the State Administration of Taxation’s hand and encourages more forceful transfer pricing policies. This is the case even though these policies diverge from OECD norms.

This paper considers the nine major areas where the Chinese position in the UN Practical Manual differs from positions in the OECD Guidelines.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: Transfer pricing, UN Practical Manual, Developing countries, OECD, China, Comparability, TNMM, Location saving, High & New Technology Status, Toll manufacturer, LSA, Location Specific Advantages

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 7, 2014 ; Last revised: January 8, 2014

Suggested Citation

Ainsworth, Richard Thompson and Shact, Andrew, Transfer Pricing: UN Practical Manual – China (January 6, 2014). Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-1. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2375785 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2375785

Contact Information

Richard Thompson Ainsworth (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
NYU - Graduate Tax Program ( email )
Bobst Library, E-resource Acquisitions
20 Cooper Square 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10003-711
United States
Andrew Shact
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 362
Downloads: 116
Download Rank: 140,928

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds