Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2376338
 


 



Historicism, Originalism and the Constitution: The Use and Abuse of the Past in American Jurisprudence


Patrick J. Charles


Government of the United States of America - Air Force

January 8, 2014

McFarland Publishing 2014

Abstract:     
The following is the Preface to "Historicism, Originalism and the Constitution." The publisher's description is as follows:

The use of history in law is a time honored tradition. Over the years the practice has assumed many forms, including historicism, intentionalism, interpretivist history, law office history, historical narrative, originalism, etc. This book picks up where past commentators have left off in this time honored debate. The different historically based approaches to adjudicating constitutional questions are weighed and considered, particularly originalism, and asserts that history in law is only legitimate if it leads to accurate results.

The book then proposes an approach to accomplish the objectives of historical accuracy and objectivity, and therefore legitimacy. Known as the historical guidepost approach, it respects historical methodologies, places text and events in their historical context, is honest about what the evidentiary record does and does not provide, mitigates judicial mythmaking, and applies history as more of a guide to legal reasoning than a strict outcome-determinative tool.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: historicism, intentionalism, originalism, constitutional interpretation, legal history, law office history, history office law, living constitution, dead hand, history in law

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 10, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Charles, Patrick J., Historicism, Originalism and the Constitution: The Use and Abuse of the Past in American Jurisprudence (January 8, 2014). McFarland Publishing 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2376338 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2376338

Contact Information

Patrick J. Charles (Contact Author)
Government of the United States of America - Air Force ( email )
Washington, DC
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 261
Downloads: 64
Download Rank: 205,572

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.359 seconds