Crisis in Legal Education or the Other Things Law Students Should Be Learning and Doing
University of California Irvine, School of Law; Georgetown University Law Center
McGeorge Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2013
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2014-9
This essay reviews the recent criticisms of legal education (costs, loss of job opportunities, content of curricula) and suggests that law students might be better served by studying and learning different things in law school – not only conventional Socratic, doctrinal and even, adversarial clinical education, but organizational development, problem solving, decision making, group dynamics, dispute resolution and dispute system design. The article also contrasts two other professions – one newer (business consulting) and another about the same age (architecture) for more adaptable models of educational change and professional task definitions and realignments. Rather than continuing the “negative” critique of current forms of legal education, this essay suggests a slightly more optimistic course for why studying and practicing law, as a more broadly defined discipline, should still be attracting both students and faculty who care about making the world more just, fair, efficient, effective, and peaceful.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33
Keywords: legal profession, legal education, conflict resolution, problem solving, sociology of professionsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 12, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.453 seconds